Governance Matters: FCA’s Latest Warning in Market Watch 83
Key Takeaways
- Governance Warning: Market Watch 83 reinforces that unclear accountability, weak systems and controls, poor training, and ineffective escalation remain core compliance failure drivers.
- Role Clarity: The FCA expects firms to define responsibilities clearly and support them with concise, regularly updated procedures and evidence of staff understanding.
- Three-Lines Discipline: Separation between business, compliance, and internal audit functions is presented as a necessary safeguard against conflicts of interest.
- Escalation Culture: Transparent escalation routes and visible tone from the top are treated as practical components of an effective compliance culture.
- Proportionate Risk Management: Firms are expected to implement risk assessment and management processes that are proportionate, even where the FCA provides limited prescriptive detail.
FCA's Latest Warning in Market Watch 83
FCA Market Watch 83 reinforces that governance failures unclear accountability, weak systems and controls, inadequate training and ineffective escalation remain a root cause of compliance breakdowns. Firms should strengthen oversight, 3-lines-of-defence separation, and evidence-based control frameworks.
The article focuses on the core governance concepts of having adequate and proportionate systems and controls in place. Regardless of the size of your firm, it needs to be clear who is responsible for what and when. Written policies and procedures that are clear, concise and regularly reviewed and updated play a key role here. Staff should then be familiarised with the policies and procedures via training, with attestations employed to demonstrate understanding and compliance.
Firm structure and the importance of the separation of different functions were also highlighted as important and something the FCA would expect to see. Delineation between the 1st line (the business), 2nd line (compliance), 3rd line (internal audit) and ensuring each line reports to the correct individual or committee to prevent conflicts of interest developing is expected. Clear lines of escalation for issues, which are made known to staff and are transparent, also form part of the expectation here along with appropriate tone from the top and the embedding of a compliance culture.
Market Watch 83 also makes clear the need for firms to implement adequate risk assessment and management processes. There is no guidance provided as to what this may entail, however, firms should ensure that the approach taken is proportionate for its size.
How Qomply can help
Qomply’s Regulatory Reporting Hub combines regulatory expertise with AI, automation and data analytics to deliver scalable, audit-ready reporting intelligence that reduces errors, lowers remediation costs, and minimises operational and regulatory risk.
Covering regimes including MiFIR, EMIR Refit, SFTR, CFTC, CSA, MAS, ASIC and HKMA, Qomply also offers a fully managed service and operates globally from London.
Frequently asked questions
-
It highlights unclear accountability, weak systems and controls, inadequate training, and ineffective escalation. The article presents those weaknesses as root causes of compliance breakdowns.
-
It says firms need written policies and procedures that are clear, concise, regularly reviewed, and properly embedded through training and attestations. The article treats documentation and staff understanding as part of the control framework.
-
It says firms should clearly separate the first line, second line, and third line and make sure each reports to the right person or committee. The article says that separation helps prevent conflicts of interest and strengthens oversight.
-
It says escalation routes should be clear, known to staff, and transparent, with the right tone from senior leadership. The article links those features directly to the FCA's expectations for effective governance.
-
They should strengthen accountability, refresh governance documents, train staff, separate control lines properly, and apply proportionate risk-management processes. The article says firms should not wait for enforcement to expose these weaknesses.
Purpose-built solutions and services for regulatory reporting
Designed to improve accuracy, reduce risk, and support confident transaction reporting.
